Home » National Debt » Recent Articles:

Spending Cuts?

January 3, 2011 National Debt No Comments

It seems as if we as Americans are being put through a large degree of uncertainy in relation to tax and social reform. Republican house has decided to try and extend Bush tax cuts beyond the immediate future. Republicans also believe that spending cuts should be the main source of funding for the federal deficit. Mistermoneyman viewers what do you think about these proposed changes?

Toxic Assets

BofA looks to sell toxic mortgages worth $1 billion: report link from: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101213/ts_nm/us_bankofamerica_toxic

Fed Purchasing More U.S. Debt, What does that do to our deficit?

The Federal Reserve faces a difficult decision at next month’s policy meeting on whether to offer further stimulus to a U.S. economy that is still growing but only slowly, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said on Friday. Policymakers could wait until December if they felt the need for greater clarity on the outlook, Bullard told CNBC television, though he acknowledged that financial markets were already assigning a very high probability of Fed action at the November meeting. “This upcoming FOMC meeting is going to be a tough call, because the economy has slowed but it hasn’t slowed so much that it’s an obvious case to do something,” Bullard said. “I do think the risk of a double-dip recession has probably receded some in the last six to eight weeks.” Bullard, a self-proclaimed hawk, said the recent downward trend in inflation was a concern, but dismissed the argument that more Fed easing, which would take the form of further Treasury purchases, would be ineffective. He cautioned against allowing the United States to go the way of Japan, a country that has struggled with a prolonged period of depressed prices and economic stagnation. He indicated that, despite some reluctance about the risks of unconventional policies, the situation might require bond purchases beyond the more than $1.7 trillion the Fed has already conducted in response to the financial crisis. “It doesn’t seem like it’s going to come back toward (the Fed’s inflation) target unless we take further action,” Bullard said. After bouncing …Continue Reading

National Debt Where Did It Come From and Who Was President

In 1981, the country had just elected Reagan to cure the “all-time-high, Trillion-Dollar debt.” But compared with the size of the American economy, the debt was at its lowest point in fifty years (see graph). Reagan was duped by the “supply siders” and his “greatest disappointment” was adding $1.6 trillion to the debt. Reagan won the 1980 presidential election claiming the national debt was at an all time high of $1 trillion, and he would bring it down. It was almost that high, but compared to the size of the American economy it was the smallest it had been in over 50 years. It just looked big because of inflation, but Reagan either did not understand inflation or enjoyed his little deception. Beyond dispute is the fact that eight years later, when he left office, the debt was $2.6 trillion. “When a conservative says it is bad for the government to spend more than it takes in, he is simply showing the same common sense that tells him to come in out of the rain.” (Reagan, 1977) To cover for him, Republicans often blame his deficits on the Congress. So I went to the most extreme pro-Reagan website and used their numbers for how Congress changed Reagan’s budgets. Now, a lot the pork Congress added was added by Republicans, and it’s entirely possible that these numbers are exaggerated, but let’s accept them as the gospel and blame the budget changes entirely on Democrats. What do the numbers say? The annual …Continue Reading

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Recent Comments:

Popular Content: